Re: Challenging the Rational Response Squad

	Duration: 10:59 minutes Upload Time: 07-07-07 00:36:49 User: g0at :::: Favorites
Description: Yup http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA-iM8PeI6E&mode=related&search= gravity 1. the force of attraction by which terrestrial bodies tend to fall toward the center of the earth. Gravitation 1. Physics. a. the force of attraction between any two masses. Compare law of gravitation. b. an act or process caused by this force. Then look up General relativity...
Comments
DrRandale ::: Favorites @magnime01: Cool. I did not know that. I got you wrong there... I thought you said there was an abrupt start or abrupt growth in the fossil record... Sorry. I was to fast there and wrong. Thanks for clearing it up. 07-07-31 17:28:10 _____________________________________________________
magnime01 ::: Favorites no worries 07-07-31 18:58:35 _____________________________________________________
bugawaz ::: Favorites if natural selection is not a theory then its a hypothesis or an opinion at best, both of which are worst and less solid than theories. when im saying its a theory, im giving it the best possibility, dont you know that? you sound like like your intelligent enough to know what a fact is. natural selection is not a fact. 07-07-26 11:59:12 _____________________________________________________
bugawaz ::: Favorites thank you for educating the ignorant. they keep shouting FACT in my ear when they dont know what fact means or have any clue of a fact. at least thats what they display. 07-07-26 11:55:20 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites binsk, to look for scientific answers to scientific questions? look nowhere else... 07-07-17 02:18:49 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites binsk, each time it makes me wonder if people like you used all this energy that they waste on saying stupid things - for something constructive, how cool that would be. i don't like waste 07-07-17 02:17:08 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
binsk ::: Favorites how ironic. 07-07-17 08:45:34 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites giro, this guy has a degree in biology. it's unbelievable... 07-07-17 02:06:13 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites Ashet. there's stoning in the OT too 07-07-17 01:20:07 _____________________________________________________
Ashetheraven ::: Favorites erm... yes I know, whats you're point? 07-07-17 04:21:18 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites Whim, gravity isn't a theory. is freefalling a theory? come on... 07-07-17 01:09:31 _____________________________________________________
Whimsicology ::: Favorites What is your definition of theory, then? I've explained why it was a theory, and I don't know what freefalling has to do with what I've said. 07-07-17 01:16:29 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites Whim, it's in the textbook, because in high school pupils learn the history of physics as well. 07-07-17 01:08:07 _____________________________________________________
Whimsicology ::: Favorites Newton's laws were in my college textbook, and this is recent. As I said, it is there because it is a useful approximation, for the same reason textbooks contain Hooke's law or the Ideal Gas equation. These things are not "true" (e.g. there is no such thing as an ideal gas), but they are very useful approximations, and if you do lab work, you will be utilizing them. 07-07-17 01:15:35 _____________________________________________________
princesszin ::: Favorites g0at, gravity isn't a theory. evolution isn't one either. the Theory of Evolution explains how evolution works. it's a scientific theory. 07-07-17 00:47:48 _____________________________________________________
g0at ::: Favorites No... Initiation of VIOLENCE. God was the first to be violent by taking away someoens life for non-violent act. read it agin and agin... 07-07-16 23:16:01 _____________________________________________________
INTJ22 ::: Favorites Did you miss what I said? God is the giver of life so He can be the taker of it when His creation rebels against Him. He is sovereign over all life. Explain to me logically why a sovereign God can't take life back from someone who is rebelling against Him, other then just saying "it's immoral". Besides, your attempt to trap God into being the initiator of violence is flawed because: 07-07-17 00:21:51 _____________________________________________________
INTJ22 ::: Favorites 1) The initiator of violence is not necessarily wrong. What if a man crawls through your window and walks up your bathroom to watch your daughter showering? Are you simply going to try to persuade him with words to leave? He holds onto the bathtub and refuses to leave, claiming he simply wants to watch. He's not being violent. Would you not grab him and forcefully kick him out? 07-07-17 00:22:44 _____________________________________________________
INTJ22 ::: Favorites 2) Violence is not only in the form of the physical. There is emotional violence, for example. You are presupposing that the physical kind is the worst kind, and that is not necessarily so. You can cause some very horrible emotional damage to a child, for example. So do claim God automatically loses because He initiated physical violence while the sinner is hurling all types of attacks towards God is illogical. 07-07-17 00:23:41 _____________________________________________________
rowsdowersavesus ::: Favorites did islamandfriends block you, g0at? because that's the only reason I can think that you didn't reply to their comments in that video. 07-07-16 23:00:52 _____________________________________________________